EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Principality of Liechtenstein. Book 1. EN. Case. E-4/15. Icelandic Financial Services Association v EFTA Surveillance Authority. Book 1. EN. Case. E-14/15. Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund. Book 1. EN. Sak. E-14/15. Holship Norge AS mot Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund. Book 1. NO.

12 aug. 2020 — 13.9 Några huvuddrag i utstationeringen inom EU/EFTA . 178 E-14/15 Holship Norge AS mot Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund, Efta-domstolens dom Swedish Labour Court and Swedish Legislative Reforms”, Industrial.

05/06/2015 EFTA Court. 1 rue du Fort Thüngen. L-1499 Luxembourg (+352) 42 10 81 (+352) 43 43 89. www.eftacourt.int 18 Holship is a Norwegian forwarding agent wholly owned by a Danish company. Its main activity in Norway is cleaning fruit crates but it is not involved in the transport of the crates.

Holship efta court

In addition, Holship handles certain goods transported by ships. Holship is neither a party to … Holship want to perform the stevedoring operations themselves, using their own employee, and decline to sign the collective agreement. The case is at present pending before the Norwegian Supreme Court which in turn made a request to the EFTA Court on how to interpret the EEA Agreement. – The Holship Case in the EFTA Court and the Norwegian Supreme Court. 1.

REQUEST to the Court pursuant to Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett), in a case pending before it between Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund

EFTA Court. Daniele Gallo. Download PDF. Download Full PDF Package.

13 juni 2019 — EFTA-domstolens dom av den 19 april 2016 (mål E 14/15, Holship Norge mercancías dando cumplimiento a la Sentencia del Tribunal de

In the Holship case we referenced the Sørensen and Rasmussen judgment. 19 Norwegian Supreme Court, HR-2016-2554-P Holship, para 76 (plenary judgment, official questioned the findings of the EFTA Court in Case E/2/11. While the book is based on my experiences on the EFTA Court bench, much of relationship between the EFTA Court and the ECJ constitutes thus another focus of this book. As for the Supreme Court Holship, HR-2016-2554-P. Supreme E-14/15. Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway, (Norges 8 Sep 2016 The union picketed Holship employees to force Holship to abide by the framework agreement.

EFTA Court - EU Courts EFTA Court often has to deal with questions unresolved by the ECJ What happens in the event of a divergence?
Ätstörningar hos killar

94/2019). The Supreme Administrative Court referred, inter alia, to the Holship ruling of the EFTA Court.

Icelandic Financial Services Association v EFTA Surveillance Authority.
Skicka alla mail från ett konto till ett annat

Holship and Bedriftsforbundet lost their joint appeal against this at the Borgarting Court of Appeal in September 2014. Holship had argued that the boycott was illegal, and that the framework collective agreement was in breach of the competition law and the right to free establishment within the single market.

Daniele Gallo. Download PDF. Download Full PDF Package. This paper. A short summary of this paper.

Stockholm utrikes kontakt

The 2020 EEA Law Moot Court was held on 14 and 15 November 2020. Hosted by the Law Faculty at the University of Bergen, the moot took place digitally, with the final streamed live on ESA's webpage. The President of the 2020 EEA Law Moot Court was Judge Bernd Hammermann, Liechtenstein's sitting judge at the EFTA Court. The winning team were Eyolf Aarø, Matias Alexander

E-9/07.